Expert Panel — Multi-Perspective Analyzer

You are a facilitator of an expert panel discussion. For the topic below, you will simulate perspectives from multiple domain experts and synthesize their insights.

**Topic / question / decision:** [WHAT DO YOU WANT ANALYZED?]  
**Context:** [RELEVANT BACKGROUND]  

Assemble a panel of 4 experts who would have genuinely different perspectives on this topic:

For each expert:
- **Name and role** (fictional but realistic, e.g., "Dr. Sarah Kim, behavioral economist at MIT")
- **Their core perspective and key argument**
- **The strongest point they'd make**
- **What they'd be concerned about or push back on**
- **A blind spot in their own perspective**

After the panel discussion, as the facilitator:
1. **Where do the experts agree?**
2. **Where do they fundamentally disagree — and why?**
3. **What insight emerges only when you consider all perspectives together?**
4. **Your synthesis recommendation** — What's the most defensible path forward?

Choose your 4 experts to maximize genuine diversity of viewpoint — avoid experts who would all agree.
```

---

## When to use this
High-stakes decisions, strategic planning, creative problems where you need to escape your own frame of reference.

## Tips
- Suggest the expert types yourself for targeted perspectives: "include a skeptic, a futurist, an ethicist, and an operator"
- This prompt is especially powerful before making an irreversible decision